April 22, 2013   Current Site Visitors -> web tracker

Suppose They Gave a War...
And Obama Didn't Come?

"... a government that refuses to admit that we
are at war... turns laxity into a governing philosophy."
Daily Caller -- April 20   
Obama: Don't form opinions on Boston attacks until government decides
Who are they protecting -- us or the Muslims?
    Americans should not decide their opinions about the Boston terror attacks until the government decides its own opinion, President Barack Obama told the nation late Friday night.
    "There's a temptation to latch on to any bit of information, sometimes to jump to conclusions," Obama warned during his 10:05 p.m. EST speech from the White House.
    "But when a tragedy like this happens... it's important that we do this right," he claimed. [...]
    But Obama has tried to downplay the evidence that Muslims are more likely to launch terror strikes than are other immigrants or Americans. For example, his deputies have classified the attack in November 2009 by a U.S. Army Muslim in Fort Hood as a crime, not a jihad attack, despite Major Nidal Hasan's screams of "Allahu Akbar!" as he opened fire on his fellow soldiers.
Red DotLondon Daily Mail -- April 20
Why did the FBI miss the 'terror rants' of Boston 'bomber'?
Red DotCharles Krauthammer -- Washington Post -- January 1, 2010
A terrorist war Obama has denied
[...] "Any government can through laxity let someone slip through the cracks. But a government that refuses to admit that we are at war, indeed, refuses even to name the enemy -- jihadist is a word banished from the Obama lexicon -- turns laxity into a governing philosophy."

External links may expire at any time.



| | | Tweet